

This is where consumers go to record their consumption experiences and discuss the effects of how consumers are influenced by their environment in ways such as their culture, family, and media. This is an ongoing testimony of why we, as consumers, do the[sometimes crazy] things we do.
Buying new soccer cleats, this is a consumer buying process that I have been through many times before. The problem recognition always starts the same in that I tear out of an old pair. The reason why I have gone through this process so many times is because typically soccer players will have three or at least two pairs of cleats. The first two are for normal hard ground play and the third specifically designed for wet/soft ground and each will usually last about a year to a year and a half.
Each information search begins with the evoked set implanted in my memory. This includes the brands I like, dislike, admire, and the shoes I can or can’t afford. This is when friends or my reference group comes into action with each friend thinking they know everything there is to know about soccer cleats.
There is so much risk derived from product availability. If you want to buy shoes from a local store they probably don’t have the styles/colors you want but if you buy them online you get the style and colors but trying them on is not available. These are shoes that are going to be worn through a whole season so of course there is going to be a high level of involvement. The comfort, styling, price, and other aspects all come into effect but rarely do players find a shoe they are truly happy with leading to the reason why there is almost always some buyer’s remorse over the purchase.
The reason why I’m writing this blog post is because they best shoes I have ever had were $55. On average I would spend around $110 for shoes but these $55 shoes I felt out-performed all my other shoes according to my standards. This information I realized is contradictory to normal consumer behavior where we assume higher price means higher quality. After I bought the $55 shoes I continue to buy them even today. Does anyone think this could be applied to the entire shoe market?
On any Sunday during the fall, my location is pretty predictable. I am staring at a t.v. watching the Indianapolis Colts. I am decked out in blue and white with my jersey and hat. I have started my pre-game rituals and I am blowing up my twitter feeds about my excitement, joy, and recently extreme frustration. I am calling or texting my family to celebrate the victory or complain about the defeat. For as long as I can remember, I have been a Colts fan. I have spent money on jerseys, posters, flags, banners, hats, hoodies, stickers, away game tickets, and home game tickets. I invest my time. Since I was young, I have invested my time, energy, and money into the Indianapolis Colts.
Over the past 5 years, I have been to over 25 Colts games. I do not own season tickets but would buy them game by game. When someone would suggest to go to a game or when opportunities to purchase tickets game around, I bought them immediately without hesitation and without any regard to the financial risk. The Colts have been the most winning team in the past decade. A win was almost a guaranteed. Fans were almost guaranteed a quality experience, entertainment, and of course a win. There was no uncertainty regarding the outcome of the purchase decision. There was no perceived risk.
Times have changed. The Colts are 0-7 this season and are almost guaranteed a loss. While I still am a Colts fan and will forever be one, I acknowledge the perceived risk of attending a game. The perceived risk is that I will spend money on tickets, food, transportation, parking, and knowing me a jersey too and that the outcome will be disappointing and I will regret my decision.
After going through the decision making process, I bought tickets and I will continue to by tickets no matter the risks. The perceived risks do not have an impact on my purchase but I do acknowledge it. My loyalty and passion override any of the potential risks.
Go Colts.
A while back I decided to go to Robert’s, a camera store, because I needed a new lens cap for my camera. My parents suggested that I look at the SLR cameras that they had for sale. We began talking with the sales associate who told me about a special deal that they were having this week that lasted for another day or two. He asked me about my camera, and he told me why I might like a new one. I had been thinking about getting a new camera, but hadn’t put too much effort into actively seeking to buy one.
The sales associate made me realize that I had a problem: I wasn’t able to take the best quality pictures that I could take. He talked with me about my actual state and then presented me with the ideal state. He showed me the special features with an SLR, and he displayed a large picture of what I could be taking. I was motivated because it would allow me to take better pictures and get the quality I desired. My goal at that point was to have a nicer camera.
I had one night to make this decision. My parents, who at this time were my reference group, kept presenting me with reasons why I should buy it. I am someone who takes time to make my decisions about expensive products. I considered the pros and cons. The perceived risk was that I would spend too much on something that I didn’t absolutely need and something I might not like. My opportunity was constrained by time. I decided to buy it, and I love my camera!
I learned that sometimes quick decisions can be made in good judgment as long as you still quickly review the pros and cons. I also learned that I have to differentiate between how my reference group feels and how I actually feel because I will be the one using the product. Also, you have to think about the sales associate’s job and make sure you can decipher the truth.